How would you define a multi-shuttle practice?
Could you have a discussion with another coach
about all the different uses
What is your definition of a multi-shuttle practice ?
How does it differ from the other practice types you use?
To have a discussion, there needs to be a definition,
otherwise, confusion is a possibility
My definition
Multi-shuttle practice has feeder(s)* continuously feeding (using many shuttles) that continues until the feeder chooses to stop.
Often, they do this whilst not attempting to return the hitter’s strokes throughout the multi-shuttle practice.
The interval between shuttles, the speed (pace), and the trajectory of feeds from the feeder can be varied.
Unlike a single shuttle (rally) practice, if an error is made by either the feeder or the hitter, the practice continues.
*multi-shuttle practices can have more than one feeder and more than one hitter.
NB. The above attempts to define multi-shuttle and explain the definition, not to discuss the merits or demerits of multi-shuttle.
The role of the feeder is crucial
in the effectiveness or otherwise of the multi shuttle practice
Types of Multi-shuttle
Racket or hand feeding to devlope .......(to a greater or lesser extent)
- Overspeed training
- Endurance training
- Reaction training
- Tactical & anticipation skills
- Technical skills
- NB not all the types of multi shuttle are as effective as each other, it could be argued that some are ineffective.
Common elements in multi shuttle practices
Static feeding: The feeder rarely moves. All shuttles come from the same place, regardless of the shot being played. Feeding trajectories do vary.
Number of shuttles: often repetitions are between 10-16, but can reach as high as 30-40
Speed of feeding: this is one of the main variables and in the control of the feeder. Feeds can be faster than a game (overspeed) or deliberately delayed. Watch more here
The effect of errors and winners: the practice continues even if the hitter(s) make an error (hitting the shuttle out or in the net), or the feeder hits a winner. Whichever happens, the ‘error does not prevent the rally from continuing. This is clearly different from a single shuttle rally practice.
The intent of the feeder: the feeder alone decides when the practice ends, and where and when the next shuttle is delivered. This is again different from a single shuttle rally practice.
When is a practice 'not' a multi-shuttle?
To create a definition, it’s important to define when something should not be called a multi-shuttle, but something else.
The names of the other practices can vary: rally feeding, singles shuttle work, etc
It’s NOT a mult-shuttle if ….
- If the player's stroke has an effect on the feeders next delivery and the feeder strikes that same shuttle. Feeders may say that they decide what feed to deliver depending on the players strokes, but that isnt the same as in a match.
- If the 'gaps' in the rally are created by players striking the same shuttle: again feeders may say that they simulate those 'gaps' . Often they either reduce the time or create false pauses to allow the player to move to the next shuttle
- If the players winners or errors end the practice: often the number of rally-ending strokes (W or E) is ignored in favour of repetition and challenge.
Do you agree with these definitions?
Would you change any?
Why do we need this discussion?
As there is very little information (almost none) contained in Coach Education publications, we need to start a discussion.
My initial aim is to create thoughts and questions for both coaches and players to consider.
Then maybe in the future, someone will write advice/instructions, produce videos, all aimed at ensuring that coaches understand the effectiveness and disadvantages of all the different types of multi shuttles.
All coaches need this information so that decisions can be made and alternatives considered.
Coaches should not be designing practice without
thought of the effect and consequences
The important coach question
What are your reasons for using a multi-shuttle practice?
… There are many types of practice to select
… Many practice elements to be included and adjusted.
… Many match situations to be replicated
… Many player thoughts and decisions to stimulate and develop
Coaches need to be certain in why they chose to do what they do. Please don’t just follow the latest trend or Instagram multi-shuttle.
To practice without thought (by coach/feeder and player) is less effective or at worse possibly harmful for development
You need to have a view and especially if it’s your ‘go-to’ practice type
Do you want to read more?
Click here if you want to explore more about the effectiveness or otherwise of the use of the practices.
Send me a question
I’m always grateful if you have read this far.
If there is anything that you have read that has helped or that you disagree with, then please send me an email.
I promise to read all your comments
It would be great to hear from you contact@badmintonandy.com
