What are your thoughts about the RECOVERY footwork in the Round the Head-court?
I will write soon about the footwork options “moving to” the part of the court as there are just as many questions for players and coaches 🙂
Which recovery footwork do you prefer ?
1) Chasse (feet up to each other)
2) Step (walk/cross over)
3) It depends on the stroke played
4) It depends on the opponents’ return
This post is Part 3 of a 4 part mini-series.
Have you watched the excellent footwork video by Badminton Family?
Before reading the rest of this post take a moment and watch this short extract. This post takes a look at the recovery footwork at 6:03 minutes
This recovery footwork has created a division from all the replies
Should your recovery with a “Running” or “Chasse” step
Some people wanted, well almost insisted that the movement should be a chasse and not a running step
Their position was very strong, “always chasse”
Others said, use both as it depends on the stroke you have played and the reply from the opponent
Certainly, running steps are faster over longer distances, Chasse movements cover small distances efficiently.
Then there are differences in the player physical abilities and size.
So many factors, it’s tough to decide what to coach and when
Plus, when would you run straight into the net?
My thoughts are that you must introduce both movements (and variations) in various practice situations and then let the player practice. It’s the practice and outcomes that will create development. Not what you have read in a manual.
Be prepared to challenge the player by creating situations that –
.. include decisions for player to make. Do this by using 1 shuttle and ensure it is returned over the net!
.. yes that was 1 shuttle
.. sometimes require speedy footwork: reduce the recovery time and vary the returns
.. don’t always feed from the same position. In fact, let the player start the practice by block feeding.
.. sometimes require quick changes in direction: include back to where they have just come from
.. allow for ‘kill’ and offensive opportunities but also create ‘scramble’ and defensive situations
.. exploit the opponents’ replies: can you ‘limit’ the opponent’s possible replies?
.. reward anticipation 🙂 allow for and encourage player anticipation
Being rigid and inflexible in your teaching will only cause you issues as your players become educated in watching the game.
How will you answer their questions if they point out movements that don’t follow your advice?
Yes, YOU may be able to chasse or cover the court easily but not everyone is as powerful as you. Check if you are creating situations where you KNOW where the shuttle is going and use these to demonstrate your theories.
Are you deliberately (or without knowing it) setting up scenarios that you control to ‘prove’ your theories ?
Coaches you have a decision to make
I’d like to recommend that it’s NOT about which movement you believe is best. It’s about which movement is most effective for the recovery the player needs. Therefore you need to create these situations on the court and manage the initial learning.
Ok, I understand that it’s easy to say here when I’m not on the court with you
What I can say in my defence is that the more situations you expose your player to the better prepared they will be. In practice ensure that
.. you test and stretch players and yourself (in the design of your sessions)
.. be prepared to help when required
.. or don’t say anything and let the challenge dictate the footwork
.. create subtle suggestions and real game images then see what happens on court
There is no one technique that fits all situations perfectly. Compromise and selection will always be required by the PLAYER. If things alter in the future as they develope or grow don’t worry, embrace the change. It’s called Practice and Coaching 😉
Can you help me?
As always I would love to read your comments and thoughts. This post has been tough to write as there are many coaches and players out there with theories on how to play and what technique to use.
I am certainly the same at times, so your feedback is essential to me. My aim is to provide guidelines that can be challenged.
I believe that it’s the PRACTICE situations that you use that will influence how you develop. If you stay true to Game-like Situations and Conditions then hopefully you will develop Game-like responses. Become a Player, not a Trainer.